子谦译文｜创业教什么：六种主流创业理论的对比研究(5)

为了进一步发展创业方法领域，本文对效果逻辑理论与其他五种创业方法从九个关键的概念维度从相似性、差异性、优势、劣势、重叠和差距等方面进行了非常详细的比较和探讨，这个过程有助于学者和从业者以更容易理解的方式组织创业方法领域。各种创业方法的清晰度和可见度的提高可以作为一种灵感来源， 促进和改进现有的创业方法并开发新的方法。因此，本文为创业方法的支持者在未来的工作中运用奠定了基础。以实践为基础的创业方法的支持者可以通过借鉴学术基础的创业方法来提高他们方法的理论严谨性。同样，以学术为基础的创业方法的支持者可以利用这种比较，通过借鉴以实践为基础的创业方法来增加其实际意义。在以比较基础上开展的工作，可以作为在相对孤立的情况下开发的不同规范性创业努力之间的一座桥梁。
In order to avoid bias toward any one particular entrepreneurial method, a conceptual framework is developed through an in-depth analysis of effectuation and five other purposefully selected entrepreneurial methods. These are discovery-driven planning (McGrath and MacMillan 1995), prescriptive entrepreneurship (Fiet 2008), business planning (Steinhoff 1971), the lean startup ethodology (Ries 2011), and designthinking (Brown2008). Choices ofentrepreneurial methods were based on the following: citation analysis, appearance on entrepreneurship courses’syllabi (see footnote in Section 2.3), perceived alignment with the definition of entrepreneurial method, and informal inquiries with a number of experienced entrepreneurship researchers around frequency of use in their educational practices. Three entrepreneurial methods with Scholarly origins were included alongside three methods introduced by practitioners. The conceptual framework consists of nine dimensions and is used as a means to elucidate similarities and differences. The discussion will then delve more deeply into the subject of effectuation, contrasting it to the five other entrepreneurial methods.