子谦译文｜创业教什么：六种主流创业方法的比较

Comparing effectuation to discovery-driven planning, prescriptive entrepreneurship, business planning, lean startup, and design thinking
效果逻辑与发现性驱动计划、规范性创业、商业计划、精益创业和设计思维的比较
子谦译文
英文原文作者： 亚沙尔 · 曼苏里 马丁 · 拉凯乌斯
文章来源：www.idunn.no
翻译：高文、朱燕空
Abstract :There has been a growing interest among entrepreneurs and students in explicit guidance for entrepreneurial action. Both scholars and practitioners have responded to this demand by suggesting a variety of entrepreneurial methods. This has led, however , to a prolife ration of relatively unrelated methods with varying degrees of rigor and relevance. In an attempt to organize and bring clarity to the range and diversity of entrepreneurial methods, this article compares effectuation with five other entrepreneurial methods along nine conceptual dimensions. Through the application of two conceptual frameworks, core underpinnings of each method are highlighted. In addition to revealing similarities and differences between the methods, the study identifies somekey implications for theory, practice, policy, and education. The strengths of effectuation on a theoretical level could be used to develop other entrepreneurial methods.Conversely, the strengths of other entrepreneurial methods could be used to shore up the potential weaknesses of effectuation,such as a lack of behavioral tactics and limited applicability in later stages of venture development. Findings from this article can thus aid entrepreneurship scholars and practitioners to improve their prescriptions and can create new avenues for developing entrepreneurial methods.