子谦译文｜创业教什么：六种主流创业理论的对比研究(48)

注释2：进行独立评分的两位作者之间的一致是性较高的，54个等级中有41个是相同的。通过作者之间的广泛讨论和对文献的详细回顾，最终在其余的维度上也达成了共识。需要讨论和评比的13个等级分布如下；三个单独的团队协作和价值创造；二个是关于资源管理、持续学习和迭代过程；一个是知识扩展，在不确定性管理、重定向能力和利益相关者互动的所有等级方面，两位作者之间是一致的。在这种讨论中涉及最多的创业方法是那些评分较低的方法，因为事实证明，缺乏一个维度比存在更难以证实。
While the grading exercise is subjective, the resulting figures illustrate patterns of potential relevance to the comparison. A similarity across most of the entrepreneurial methods is an emphasis on knowledge expansion, value creation, and iterative process, as well as a lack of emphasis on team collaboration. Given the methods were developed largely in isolation from one another, these similarities are somewhat unexpected. Some differences are also visible. Three of the entrepreneurial methods address the nine dimensions more comprehensively than the others: effectuation, the lean startup methodology, and design thinking. Moreover, redirection power and stakeholder interaction are important differentiators between them and the others. Business planning is largely mute on many of the nine dimensions.