子谦译文｜创业教什么：六种主流创业方法的比较(49)

虽然评分工作是主观性的，但得出的数字说明了与比较可能有关的模式。大多数创业方法的一个相似之处是强调知识扩展、价值创造和迭代过程，但是缺乏对团队合作的重视。考虑到这些方法在很大程度上是在彼此孤立的情况下发展起来的，因此这些相似之处多少有些出人意料，但一些差异也是显而易见的，其中效果逻辑、精益创业和设计思维这三种方法就比其他方法更全面地指出了这九个维度。此外，重定向能力和利益相关者的互动是区分这几个维度的重要因素。在这九个维度中，商业计划在许多方面基本上是沉默的。
Although some of the entrepreneurial methods incorporate most of the nine dimensions, they can nevertheless benefit from further elaboration in order to makethem more comprehensible. For instance, the fact that effectuation is graded highly on stakeholder interaction does not necessarily mean that practical pointers are given for how individual entrepreneurs can form and leverage such interactions. In a similar fashion, the fact that the lean startup methodology is graded highly on continuous learning does not necessarily mean that the prescribed learning mechanisms are grounded in a theoretical understanding of continuous learning. In sum, the fact that an entrepreneurial method emphasizes a particular dimension does not make the emphasis actionable or rigorous.