子谦译文｜创业教什么：六种主流创业理论的对比研究(19)

Tactics tie the abstract nature of the logic to the tangible realm of entrepreneurial practice, which give rise to what can be considered outcome by outsiders.

Furthermore, they can be effectively documented by observational studies since they are closest to the sphere of concrete action.
策略将逻辑的抽象本质与创业实践的有形领域联系在一起，从而产生了可以被外人认可的结果。此外，由于它们最接近具体行动的范围，因此又可以通过观察性研究有效地加以记录。

Developing a conceptual framework in three step
通过三步建立一个概念性的框架
While the framework in Fig. 1 allows for a general three-tiered comparison across entrepreneurial methods, an in-depth comparison on a more fundamental level would necessitate a more fine-grained analysis. A framework has been developed here for this very purpose and involves a comparative analysis in three steps. In the first step, Mansoori’s (2015) three-tiered framework allowed for the mapping of six entrepreneurial methods onto the three levels: logic, model, and tactics. In these condstep, these levels were compared, resulting in the summary shown in Table 1. In the third and final step, a more fine-grained framework consisting of nine conceptual dimensions applicable to the six entrepreneurial methods was developed. It was subsequently employed in another comparative analysis (see Section 4). These nine conceptual dimensions were inductively generated by reviewing existing literature on six entrepreneurial methods; information extracted from the literature was viewed as quasi-empirical data.