子谦译文｜创业教什么：六种主流创业理论的对比研究(60)

本研究的一个重要理论影响是，学者可以利用一些创业方法的关键优势来改进其他需要理论和实践发展的创业方法，尤其是，从这个调查中获得的见解使学者们能够利用效果逻辑理论、精益创业和设计思维提供的可操作、战术处方的优势。同时，我们也研究了这六种方法的弱点，特别是在团队协作和情境敏感性领域。例如，当潜在的损失远远超出承受极限时，或者角色和责任已经确定时、持续重定向战略选择是一个不太可行的战略时，提出基于效果逻辑理论的建议可能没有多大意义。
To advance beyond the current state of entrepreneurial methods,researchers need to recognize entrepreneurial methods as a legitimate field of scholarly inquiry. One way could be to adopt an integrated approach, combining different methods into more comprehensive meta-methods that are both “theoretically-driven and empirically-tested”(Fiet 2008, p. 11) in a broad variety of contexts and situations. Such work could be guided by the three-tiered framework and the nine conceptual dimensions put forth in this article and could draw from and relate to extant literature, such as venture success factors (Hong et al. 2013; Marmer et al. 2011) and innovation and startup ecosystems (Gauthier et al. 2017),among others. An integrated approach could also further the development of a prescription-based and pragmatic view of the entrepreneurial process. It is argued in this article that a combined view may be the most accurate and effective one. Perhaps entrepreneurship is when individuals manage uncertainty by expanding their knowledge and resource base through continuous learning from feedback, in an iterative and interactive manner involving close collaborators, acting to create new kinds of value for oneself and for others.