子谦译文｜创业教什么：六种主流创业方法的比较(60)

这项研究的一个重要理论影响是，学者可以利用某些创业方法的主要优势来改善那些需要理论和实践发展的方法，尤其是从这个研究中获得的见解可以让学者们充分利用效果逻辑的优势，它是由精益创业和设计思维方法提供的可操作、具有战术方法的优势。同时，我们也研究了这六种方法的弱点，特别是在团队合作和情境敏感性方面。比如，当潜在的损失远远超出承受极限、或者角色和责任已经确定时，而持续重定向的战略选择不太可行的时候，这时提出基于效果逻辑的建议可能就没有多大意义了。
To advance beyond the current state of entrepreneurial methods,researchers need to recognize entrepreneurial methods as a legitimate field of scholarly inquiry. One way could be to adopt an integrated approach, combining different methods into more comprehensive meta-methods that are both “theoretically-driven and empirically-tested”(Fiet 2008, p. 11) in a broad variety of contexts and situations. Such work could be guided by the three-tiered framework and the nine conceptual dimensions put forth in this article and could draw from and relate to extant literature, such as venture success factors (Hong et al. 2013; Marmer et al. 2011) and innovation and startup ecosystems (Gauthier et al. 2017),among others. An integrated approach could also further the development of a prescription-based and pragmatic view of the entrepreneurial process. It is argued in this article that a combined view may be the most accurate and effective one. Perhaps entrepreneurship is when individuals manage uncertainty by expanding their knowledge and resource base through continuous learning from feedback, in an iterative and interactive manner involving close collaborators, acting to create new kinds of value for oneself and for others.